Polanski Bid for Reconsideration of Sentence on 1977 Rape Denied | BH Courier

Polanski Bid for Reconsideration of Sentence on 1977 Rape Denied

Posted: Monday, April 3, 2017 – 4:56 PM

(AFP) A US judge on Monday rejected a motion by fugitive filmmaker Roman Polanski seeking assurances that he can return to the United States without fear of being jailed for having sex with a minor four decades ago.

The Oscar-winning director of “The Pianist” and “Chinatown” was accused of drugging the 13-year-old before raping her at film star Jack Nicholson’s house in Los Angeles in 1977.

He admitted statutory rape after a number of more serious charges were dropped, and spent an initial 42 days in jail before getting out on bail ahead of his trial.

But in 1978, convinced a judge was going to scrap his plea deal and send him to prison for decades, he fled for France and has been on the run ever since.

His attorney Harland Braun told Los Angeles Superior Court the 83-year-old filmmaker, who lives in Paris, had “already done his time” and wanted to resolve the case with a finding that he has completed his sentence.

He asked Judge Scott Gordon to order prosecutors to give some indication of how much time — if any — they want Polanski to serve if he returns.

Gordon ruled, however, that there was “no sufficient or compelling basis for reconsideration of these issues.” 

- Cat-and-mouse -

“The people have unambiguously stated their desire to avoid discussing any substantive issues regarding Polanski’s case until he is physically present in the court’s jurisdiction,” Gordon wrote in a 13-page ruling.  

“The district attorney is acting well within her discretion to decline to state a position to defendant absent from court and in warrant status.”

The district attorney’s office had objected to what they say amounted to an “advance preview” of Polanski’s potential sentence.

“The people simply do not believe that it is in the best interests of justice to give a wealthy celebrity different treatment from any other fugitive from justice,” Deputy District Attorney Michele Hanisee said.

Hanisee wrote in a filing to the court that Polanski “wants answers — but will only show up if he likes the answers.”

“He forfeited his right to make requests of the court when he fled,” she added.

Braun, however, dismissed the ruling as “one more attempt by the Los Angeles Superior Court to cover up for past judicial misconduct.”

Polanski has been engaged in a decades-long cat-and-mouse game with US officials seeking his extradition for trial, before a global audience split between continuing outrage and forgiveness for his acts.

He was arrested in Switzerland in 2009 on a US extradition request and spent 10 months under house arrest before Bern rejected the US order.

- ‘No sense’ -

The United States then asked Poland to extradite Polanski in January 2015, but the country’s Supreme Court ruled in December that he had served his time under the plea deal. 

Braun has also written to Gordon to unseal a secret transcript of the testimony of Roger Gunson, the prosecutor in the Polanski case, collected in 2010 in the US.

The lawyer believes the testimony supports Polanski’s claim that he had an agreement to serve just 48 days and that — taken with the Polish decision — it should convince US authorities that Polanski has served his time. 

A decision will be made on this motion on April 26, the court said.

Braun said he was surprised to hear about the judge’s decision at the same time that the media was informed.

“This morning he set a hearing on April 26 about unsealing the transcript of Mr Gunson and he basically then rules, which really took me by surprise,” he told AFP.

“I didn’t believe it when someone called me… It makes no sense, it’s confusing. He’s denied the motion but he’s going to have a hearing about unsealing it.”

He said he would probably speak with Polanski on Tuesday to discuss the case.

ft/oh

facebooktwitterpinterestmail